|
| Comparing the racial diversity of the journalists | ||||||||||
| at America's daily newspapers | ||||||||||
| with the communities that they serve | ||||||||||
| Newsroom diversity report for | ||||||||||
| Arizona Daily Star, Tucson | ||||||||||
| Tucson, Arizona | ||||||||||
| Owner: Pulitzer (Mo.) | ||||||||||
| From a report for the Knight Foundation | ||||||||||
| by Bill Dedman and Stephen K. Doig, June 2005 | ||||||||||
| Click here to read the national report or to select another newspaper | ||||||||||
| Year | Non-white % of newsroom staff |
|
||||||||
| 2005 | 23.7 | |||||||||
| 2004 | 23.0 | |||||||||
| 2003 | 27.8 | |||||||||
| 2002 | 24.8 | |||||||||
| 2001 | 24.8 | |||||||||
| 2000 | 16.2 | |||||||||
| 1999 | 18.6 | |||||||||
| 1998 | 17.1 | |||||||||
| 1997 | 19.2 | |||||||||
| 1996 | 16.2 | |||||||||
| 1995 | 19.3 | |||||||||
| 1994 | 17.6 | |||||||||
| 1993 | Did not report | |||||||||
| 1992 | 16.8 | |||||||||
| 1991 | 9.9 | |||||||||
| 1990 | 0.0 | |||||||||
| The latest year at peak is | 2003 | |||||||||
| See the notes and definitions section below for the sources of these figures. | ||||||||||
| Newsroom Diversity Index | ||||||||||
| for Arizona Daily Star, Tucson | ||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||
| Year | Non-white % of newsroom staff | Non-white % of circulation area | Newsroom Diversity Index (parity=100) | |||||||
| 2005 | 23.7 | 40.5 | 58 | |||||||
| 2004 | 23.0 | 40.5 | 57 | |||||||
| How the index is calculated | ||||||||||
| The Newsroom Diversity Index is the non-white percentage of the newsroom staff | ||||||||||
| divided by the non-white percentage of residents in the circulation area. | ||||||||||
| (Parity = 100.) | ||||||||||
| Company index | ||||||||||
| This newspaper's owner, Pulitzer (Mo.), | ||||||||||
| has a companywide, circulation-weighted Diversity Index of 59. | ||||||||||
| See the notes and definitions section below for the sources of these figures. | ||||||||||
| Peer group comparison | ||||||||||
| for Arizona Daily Star, Tucson | ||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||
| This newspaper's Newsroom Diversity Index is 58. | This paper | |||||||||
| Peer group | ||||||||||
| Compare that with 64, which is the median Diversity Index for all newspapers | ||||||||||
| reporting in this circulation category of 100,001 to 250,000 daily sales. | ||||||||||
| In that group, this newspaper's Diversity Index ranks 33 out of 58 | ||||||||||
| newspapers reporting in the category of 100,001 to 250,000 daily sales. | ||||||||||
| An example of a newspaper of similar circulation, in an area of similar level of non-white residents, but one that has a relatively high Diversity Index, is South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, with a 28.3 percent non-white staff in a community that is 36.1 percent non-white. Its index is 79. | ||||||||||
| FYI, in circulation, this newspaper's average weekday circulation of | ||||||||||
| approximately 100,824 ranks 99 out of 1,410 daily newspapers in the US. | ||||||||||
| See the notes and definitions section below for the sources of these figures. | ||||||||||
| Details on race/ethnicity | ||||||||||
| in the circulation area | ||||||||||
| and the home county | ||||||||||
| of Arizona Daily Star, Tucson | ||||||||||
| Circulation area | ||||||||||
| Race/ethnicity | % of population | Number of residents |
|
|||||||
| Hispanic | 31.8 | 300,489 | ||||||||
| Black | 2.8 | 25,993 | ||||||||
| Asian and Pacific Islander | 2.0 | 18,711 | ||||||||
| Native-American | 2.4 | 22,508 | ||||||||
| Other non-white | 0.1 | 1,068 | ||||||||
| Multi-racial | 1.5 | 14,294 | ||||||||
| Non-white | 40.5 | 383,063 | ||||||||
| White | 59.5 | 562,392 | ||||||||
| Total | 945,455 | |||||||||
| Home county: Pima | ||||||||||
| Race/ethnicity | % of population | Number of residents |
|
|||||||
| Hispanic | 29.3 | 247,578 | ||||||||
| Black | 2.9 | 24,047 | ||||||||
| Asian and Pacific Islander | 2.1 | 17,486 | ||||||||
| Native-American | 2.6 | 21,821 | ||||||||
| Other non-white | 0.1 | 1,012 | ||||||||
| Multi-racial | 1.6 | 13,082 | ||||||||
| Non-white | 38.5 | 325,026 | ||||||||
| White | 61.5 | 518,720 | ||||||||
| Total | 843,746 | |||||||||
| The home county of this newspaper is Pima. | ||||||||||
| About this report | ||||||||||
| This third annual report for the Knight Foundation adds context to an annual survey by the American Society of Newspaper Editors. ASNE has set a goal that | ||||||||||
| every newspaper, to help it know its community and gather the news, should employ at least one non-white journalist, and that newspapers should strive to | ||||||||||
| employ non-whites in proportion to their share of the community. ASNE's report, at www.asne.org, shows each newspaper's non-white employment, but does | ||||||||||
| not disclose how closely that employment mirrors the newspaper's circulation area. | ||||||||||
| That gap is filled by the report you are reading now. This report was not done by ASNE, but was done for the Knight Foundation by Bill Dedman and | ||||||||||
| Stephen K. Doig. It shows how close each newspaper is to ASNE's goal, by comparing the newsroom staffing with the circulation area population. | ||||||||||
| The full report is at www.powerreporting.com/knight. | ||||||||||
| Notes and definitions | ||||||||||
| 1. The Newsroom Diversity Index is the non-white percentage of the newsroom staff divided by the non-white percentage of the circulation area's residents. Parity = 100. | ||||||||||
| 2. Source for staffing: Survey by American Society of Newspaper Editors, April 2005. Newspapers report non-white staff as of the end of the previous year. | ||||||||||
| 3. Following ASNE's definition, newsroom staff includes only supervisors, reporters, editors, copy/layout editors and photographers. | ||||||||||
| 4. Also following ASNE's definition, "whites," "blacks," etc., exclude Hispanics, who are counted in a separate category. | ||||||||||
| 5. Source for boundaries of this newspaper's circulation area: ZIP Code circulation data, Audit Bureau of Circulations, latest available. | ||||||||||
| 6. A paper may define its circulation area differently for marketing efforts, or news coverage, or to set advertising rates. | ||||||||||
| 7. If ZIP Codes or counties are used, this report applies a threshold: 10 percent household penetration is required to include an area in the circulation area. | ||||||||||
| 8. Source for the demographics of residents of that circulation area: US Census 2000. | ||||||||||
| 9. Source for total circulation: Editor & Publisher magazine, Monday-Friday average at year-end 2004. | ||||||||||
| 10. Staff of non-English publications, such as the Miami Herald's El Nuevo Herald, are excluded from the ASNE staffing survey for the first time this year. | ||||||||||
| Demographics of ZIP Codes | ||||||||||
| where sales were reported by | ||||||||||
| Arizona Daily Star, Tucson | ||||||||||
| Note that some ZIP Codes listed here may not have been included in determining the newspaper's circulation area. In calculating the Diversity Index, a | ||||||||||
| ZIP Code was included only if the household penetration was at least 10 percent. Any lower-penetration ZIP Codes are also listed here for your information. | ||||||||||
| Also, if the newspaper reported more than 300 ZIP Codes, only the top 300 in weekday sales are listed here. | ||||||||||
| ZIP / City / State / Approx. distance in miles from the newspaper's home office | Weekday sales | Households | Penetration % (daily sales per 100 households) | Median household income | Non-white % of population |
Hispanic % of population |
Black % of population |
Native % of population |
Asian % of population |
|
| 85710 / Tucson / AZ / 8.3 mi. | 6,439 | 24,729 | 26.0 | $35,296 | 23.9 | 15.2 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 2.1 | |
| 85737 / Tucson / AZ / 18.6 mi. | 6,326 | 12,427 | 50.9 | $61,390 | 12.0 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | |
| 85614 / Green Valley / AZ / 23.9 mi. | 5,361 | 10,217 | 52.5 | $40,213 | 5.0 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | |
| 85718 / Tucson / AZ / 10 mi. | 5,111 | 12,127 | 42.1 | $63,756 | 13.6 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 3.1 | |
| 85711 / Tucson / AZ / 4.5 mi. | 4,575 | 17,965 | 25.5 | $30,909 | 39.6 | 29.5 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 2.7 | |
| 85713 / Tucson / AZ / 17.1 mi. | 4,348 | 15,946 | 27.3 | $26,884 | 72.8 | 62.1 | 5.8 | 2.8 | 0.9 | |
| 85704 / Tucson / AZ / 11.7 mi. | 4,341 | 12,206 | 35.6 | $45,465 | 16.6 | 11.3 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 2.2 | |
| 85750 / Tucson / AZ / 10.6 mi. | 4,116 | 10,843 | 38.0 | $66,411 | 14.0 | 7.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.7 | |
| 85712 / Tucson / AZ / 6.6 mi. | 4,108 | 16,137 | 25.5 | $27,699 | 29.2 | 19.3 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 2.8 | |
| 85705 / Tucson / AZ / 7.9 mi. | 4,078 | 24,067 | 16.9 | $23,047 | 42.8 | 32.4 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 2.4 | |
| 85706 / Tucson / AZ / 5.1 mi. | 4,005 | 20,190 | 19.8 | $27,369 | 77.3 | 70.4 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 0.5 | |
| 85719 / Tucson / AZ / 5.4 mi. | 3,482 | 18,206 | 19.1 | $23,324 | 31.8 | 18.9 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 5.8 | |
| 85741 / Tucson / AZ / 26.4 mi. | 3,450 | 11,909 | 29.0 | $45,370 | 25.0 | 18.8 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 2.2 | |
| 85745 / Tucson / AZ / 11.9 mi. | 3,450 | 11,959 | 28.8 | $42,457 | 56.8 | 49.1 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 1.8 | |
| 85715 / Tucson / AZ / 18.8 mi. | 3,368 | 6,846 | 49.2 | $54,016 | 17.0 | 10.7 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 2.6 | |
| 85730 / Tucson / AZ / 22.4 mi. | 3,161 | 14,710 | 21.5 | $38,779 | 32.9 | 20.2 | 6.4 | 0.7 | 3.1 | |
| 85749 / Tucson / AZ / 19 mi. | 2,577 | 6,708 | 38.4 | $78,026 | 12.3 | 7.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.9 | |
| 85716 / Tucson / AZ / 5.3 mi. | 2,559 | 16,466 | 15.5 | $27,943 | 30.3 | 20.7 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | |
| 85746 / Tucson / AZ / 10 mi. | 2,533 | 14,020 | 18.1 | $36,773 | 71.0 | 56.7 | 2.4 | 9.8 | 0.8 | |
| 85742 / Tucson / AZ / 20.7 mi. | 2,416 | 7,838 | 30.8 | $59,888 | 19.5 | 14.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.7 | |
| 85747 / Tucson / AZ / 14.7 mi. | 2,146 | 4,255 | 50.4 | $56,674 | 26.8 | 16.7 | 4.9 | 0.5 | 2.3 | |
| 85748 / Tucson / AZ / 11 mi. | 2,098 | 6,113 | 34.3 | $59,250 | 18.5 | 10.8 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 2.8 | |
| 85739 / Tucson / AZ / 22 mi. | 2,059 | 5,125 | 40.2 | $47,001 | 17.2 | 14.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | |
| 85714 / Tucson / AZ / 0 mi. | 1,921 | 4,462 | 43.1 | $24,835 | 91.4 | 87.1 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | |
| 85743 / Tucson / AZ / 18.8 mi. | 1,908 | 6,760 | 28.2 | $50, | ||||||